lichess.org
Donate

My 'Favourite opponents"

(I googled 10 min to no help).

'Favourite opponents' used to be accessible from your profile. I want to know who my favourite opponents are.

I would guess that lichess has removed this link. BUT. That the alternative is still there. IF. You have the url. That the old url ... something like .. www.lichess/profile/favourite-opponents .. still work. Thanks!
The numbers are wrong. Me vs romanruslan , _ 16 games. Me vs Elmu , 17 games. _ (Vs romr.. all rated, vs Elmu all unrated ). BUT. In the link there are the wrong numbers. _ 6 vs romr.. , 9 vs Elmu.
Vs SergeyMamontov I have 25 games. _ Correct number in link. _ All played this year. The other two I have games against for 2 years ago until very resent.
I think,it takes in consideration only your recent 1000 games played. I had a conversation with a developer about this few years ago and they noted that showing favorite opponents of all games played wouldn't be feasible, as some players have a lot of games,like @german11 for example.
@KenulL_76 said in #3:
> Favorite opponents are private. They can only be accessed by the user. Only the account holder can see their favorite opponents
Yes they are, did I say otherwise?
Oh I see; with "They are accessable for me", I was talking about my favorite opponents and that the feature is still available. Afterwards I provided the link for Viking.
You can view it but for yourself only.
Also, you don't get true stats. For that, go to one of your favourite opponents username profile and there you can see real data.
@Risky-Chess said in #6:
> I think,it takes in consideration only your recent 1000 games played. I had a conversation with a developer about this few years ago and they noted that showing favorite opponents of all games played wouldn't be feasible, as some players have a lot of games,like @german11 for example.
But why exactly it wouldn't be feasible? It would only take a bit more time but other than that..
@Katoh1 said in #9:
> But why exactly it wouldn't be feasible? It would only take a bit more time but other than that..
Money? Time for the algorithm to compute. They probably pay for the cpu-processing. (Same reason, you have to manually click for computer game review). 5000 latest games would be better, (but electricity drives global warming).

Is it expensive cpu-wise? I don't know.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.